Boost Testing :
From: Marshall Clow (marshall_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-19 15:00:48
"Stephen W. Carson" <StephenC_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>OK, I'm cooking with gas now... I think. I'm now running with the
>following command line:
>python regression.py --runner=Dirxion --bjam-toolset=darwin
I've been promising myself that I would do this, but have been lacking the CFT.
>This way I'm not relying on CodeWarrior to build either bjam or
>process_jam_log, (I'm not losing anything by letting gcc build
I wouldn't think so.
>I have attached the .jam file that I'm succeeding with. Should I
>try to merge my changes in or will Rene or someone else more
>comfortable with the scripting language do that?
>I haven't seen my test results show up yet but a quick glance at
>bjam.log suggests that there may be more problems to deal with in
>the CodeWarrior on Mac regression.
>The regression tests took half the time with CodeWarrior that they
>do with gcc. It looks like some libraries are skipped when running
>CodeWarrior tests. Is CodeWarrior also a lot faster than gcc?
CW is significantly faster than gcc, yes.
Some of that is the IDE, but a bunch is the compiler, too.
-- -- Marshall Marshall Clow Idio Software <mailto:marshall_at_[hidden]> It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.