Re: [Boost-testing] CodeWarrior on Mac

From: Marshall Clow (marshall_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-19 15:00:48

  "Stephen W. Carson" <StephenC_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>OK, I'm cooking with gas now... I think.  I'm now running with the 
>following command line:
>python regression.py --runner=Dirxion --bjam-toolset=darwin 
>--pjl-toolset=darwin --toolsets=cw-9_3-darwin

Cool.
I've been promising myself that I would do this, but have been lacking the CFT.

>This way I'm not relying on CodeWarrior to build either bjam or 
>process_jam_log,  (I'm not losing anything by letting gcc build 
>those, right?)

I wouldn't think so.

>I have attached the .jam file that I'm succeeding with.  Should I 
>try to merge my changes in or will Rene or someone else more 
>comfortable with the scripting language do that?
>
>I haven't seen my test results show up yet but a quick glance at 
>bjam.log suggests that there may be more problems to deal with in 
>the CodeWarrior on Mac regression.
>
>The regression tests took half the time with CodeWarrior that they 
>do with gcc. It looks like some libraries are skipped when running 
>CodeWarrior tests.  Is CodeWarrior also a lot faster than gcc?

CW is significantly faster than gcc, yes.
Some of that is the IDE, but a bunch is the compiler, too.

-- 
-- Marshall
Marshall Clow     Idio Software   <mailto:marshall_at_[hidden]>
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.
It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed,
the hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a warning.
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.