Re: [Boost-testing] CodeWarrior on Mac

From: Rene Rivera (grafik.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-19 15:03:03

Stephen W. Carson wrote:
> OK, I'm cooking with gas now... I think.  

Awesome... I just love fire ;-)

>I'm now running with the 
> following command line:
> python regression.py --runner=Dirxion --bjam-toolset=darwin 
> --pjl-toolset=darwin --toolsets=cw-9_3-darwin
> 
> This way I'm not relying on CodeWarrior to build either bjam or 
> process_jam_log,  (I'm not losing anything by letting gcc build those, 
> right?)

No problem... getting the tests themselves running is more important. 
Once enough things work, it will be possible to then make pjl build, and 
  making bjam build is even easier.

> I have attached the .jam file that I'm succeeding with.  Should I try to 
> merge my changes in or will Rene or someone else more comfortable with 
> the scripting language do that?

I'll make appropriate changes to cw-tools.jam. And you can try that when 
it's in CVS.

> I haven't seen my test results show up yet but a quick glance at 
> bjam.log suggests that there may be more problems to deal with in the 
> CodeWarrior on Mac regression.
> 
> The regression tests took half the time with CodeWarrior that they do 
> with gcc. It looks like some libraries are skipped when running 
> CodeWarrior tests.  Is CodeWarrior also a lot faster than gcc?

CodeWarrior is blindingly fast with templates... GCC is not :-(

> Thanks for all the help so far!

Thank you for the effort to get it working :-)

-- 
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com - 102708583/icq