Boost logo

Boost Testing :

From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-15 16:13:18

Jeff Garland writes:
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:47:07 -0600, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote
>> That's because the page only lists failures for "required" toolsets -
>> - the ones that we (Boost developers) commit to keep in accordance with
>> "no regression" rule. The toolsets are enumerated in
>> failures-markup.xml and are highlighted as bold on the library and
>> summary report pages.
> That's interesting -- was there a discussion I missed about the
> 'required set' of compilers / standard libraries?

I'm not sure if you've missed them, but there was a few which were
summarized here:

> Somehow I was under the impression that each library author was
> still pretty much deciding what to do with these.

Yep, but it doesn't contradict what I said. Remeber that "no
regressions" rule still allows you to mark up the toolset as

Aleksey Gurtovoy
MetaCommunications Engineering

Boost-testing list run by mbergal at