|
Boost Testing : |
From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-09 05:10:51
David Abrahams writes:
> Martin Wille <mw8329_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>>>>- bugs in the testing procedure take too long to get fixed
>>> I think all I can say on this one is said here --
>>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/119341.
>>
>> I'm not trying to imply Misha or you wouldn't do enough. However, the
>> fact that only two people have the knowledge and the access to the
>> result collection stage of the testing process is a problem in itself.
>
> That is worrisome.
We'll be happy to fill in anybody who is interested. It's not that
complicated.
>
>>>>- incremental testing doesn't work flawlessly
>>> That's IMO another "top 10" issue that hurts a lot.
>
> It's a bit of a problem that when bjam scans for header dependencies
> it can't preprocess the files, so dependencies created by
>
> #include SOME_MACRO()
>
> don't get registered.
What's the problem with doing real preprocessing when something like
above is detected?
-- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering