|
Boost Testing : |
From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-12 08:03:43
Vladimir Prus writes:
> Daniel James wrote:
>
>> Vladimir Prus wrote:
>>> Yea.. Daniel has moved the tests to status/Jamfile, which is not the
>>> perfect solution.
>>
>> I agree, I just wanted to get something working with as little fuss as
>> possible.
>>
>>> Why don't we fix the "test_path_to_library_name" function. Say, it's
>>> given:
>>>
>>> bin.v2/libs/functional/hash/test/hash_built_in_array_test.test/....
>>>
>>> It can find the first element that looks like "whatever.test" and take
>>> everything between "bin.v2/libs" and "test/<the element ending in .test>
>>> as the name of the library?
>>>
>>> Will that break anything? A quick change I've just made works OK for
>>> functional/hash.
>>
>> No idea, but can this wait until after the release?
>
> 1. As Victor said, what release. IIRC, there some talks about May 1 as
> code
> freeze date, and it's still a lot of time.
>
> 2. I'd rather no wait, as I want to get regression tests fully working
> with
> Boost.Build V2 ASAP.
>
> FWIW, my original change broke reporting of regex (which has tests in
> regex/test and regex/example directories). Yet another variant worked fine
> with both regex and functional, I'm now rerunning all the tests to see if
> I
> broke anything else.
If you commit this, please make sure the corresponding changes are
applied for v1 as well (unless you plan to leave v1 tests in the current
location).
-- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering