Boost logo

Boost Testing :

From: Martin Wille (mw8329_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-01 13:09:29

Jeff Garland wrote:
> On Sun, 01 May 2005 10:45:52 -0700, Victor A. Wagner Jr. wrote

> Isn't it possible that the link step didn't rerun from a previous build and so
> only the run step was updated? Otherwise I would agree that you would expect
> the link and run steps to be closer together.

Those two timestamps very close together in .xml files for tests I know
to take ages. I'm not sure whether the timestamps carry any relevant

What we need is some indication about

        1. when a test was run
        2. how long the run did take

In the best of all worlds, we'd also have

        3. How many CPU time, RAM, etc did the run take


Boost-testing list run by mbergal at