[Boost-testing] Re: VC-8 failures are getting automatically listed as "expected"?

From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-18 05:29:30

Aleksey Gurtovoy writes:
> John Maddock writes:
>> Is there something special in the mark-up that VC-8 failures get
>> automatically listed as failing?  I ask because there are currently
>> two regex tests that fail for this compiler, which did actually pass a
>> while back, but I didn't notice 'cos they were marked as expected in
>> the table, even though I can't find anything in the xml that would
>> cause that to be the case.  What's happening here?
>
> Well, if you follow the failures' links, you will see this:
>
>     Notes
>
>       This failure was present in the reference ("last-known-good") release.
>
> IOW, these failures are gray (not yellow or red) because they are _not_
> regressions from 1.32.

... nor are "new".

-- 
Aleksey Gurtovoy
MetaCommunications Engineering