[Boost-testing] Re: VC-8 failures are getting automatically listed as "expected"?

From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-18 05:20:49

John Maddock writes:
> Is there something special in the mark-up that VC-8 failures get
> automatically listed as failing?  I ask because there are currently
> two regex tests that fail for this compiler, which did actually pass a
> while back, but I didn't notice 'cos they were marked as expected in
> the table, even though I can't find anything in the xml that would
> cause that to be the case.  What's happening here?

Well, if you follow the failures' links, you will see this:

    Notes
 
      This failure was present in the reference ("last-known-good") release.

IOW, these failures are gray (not yellow or red) because they are _not_
regressions from 1.32.

-- 
Aleksey Gurtovoy
MetaCommunications Engineering