Re: [Boost-testing] Request for new 'unresolved issues' view

From: Victor A. Wagner Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-15 04:27:32

At 00:41 2005-06-15, Markus Schöpflin wrote:
>Martin Wille wrote:
>
> > My understanding is that this is what the people who run the tests do
> > for problems that can get fixed rather trivially. Bigger problems
> > usually are being dealt with by the respective library maintainers.
>
>Testers don't usually have CVS write access, I believe. But I don't know
>for sure, I have to admit. And I'm not sure we should require more than the
>ressources they are donnating from the testers.

I'm the only person on the boost project labelled "tester" at sourceforge
I have CVS write access

> > What we need is that library maintainers get notified automatically when
> > something breaks. However, this is already work in progress (The "boost
> > regression notification" emails already seem to help. I suggest we add
> > the respective date to their topics).
>
>I'm sure this would help alot. But the platform I'm interested in (Tru64)
>isn't listed in this mail. What do I have to do to get it added?
>
>Markus
>
>_______________________________________________
>Boost-Testing mailing list
>Boost-Testing_at_[hidden]
>http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-testing

Victor A. Wagner Jr.      http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
               "There oughta be a law"