|
Boost Testing : |
From: D. Kevin McGrath (dmcgrath_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-24 15:14:25
In the case of the tests that I ran on gcc 3.4.3 under linux, that's
as far as the tests got. And since they weren't tested, they didn't
fail, right?
I haven't looked too closely at why it is happening yet, but here's
the last line from the results/bjam.log file:
"/usr/bin/objcopy" --set-section-flags .debug_str=contents,debug "/
Boost_Regression/results/bin/
boost/libs/numeric/conversion/test/converter_test.test/gcc-3_4_3-
linux/debug/converter_test.o"
Kevin McGrath
On 24 Jun 2005, at 13:55, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> David Abrahams writes:
>
>> Can anyone explain to me why in
>> http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-HEAD/
>> developer/python.html
>> the vc-6_5-stlport tests that fail show up as failures, but the msvc
>> tests that fail show up as white rectangles?
>>
>
> The exact answer requires investigation, but it's quite likely to
> be related to
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.build/6582.
>
> --
> Aleksey Gurtovoy
> MetaCommunications Engineering
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-Testing mailing list
> Boost-Testing_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-testing
>