Boost logo

Boost Testing :

From: Doug Gregor (dgregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-12 09:46:55

On Jul 12, 2005, at 8:15 AM, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:

> Martin Wille writes:
>> Hi,
> Hi Martin,
>> with the new, xml-based result rendering, we lost a feature
>> regression-tests had before: compiler warnings being displayed. I
>> consider that a significant loss, and I think if we don't fix that
>> then
>> we'll experience a quality loss. I already fixed several warnings I
>> stumbled over or I got told about on IRC (signed vs unsigned,
>> initialization order). I'm afraid there are a lot more warnings
>> lurking,
>> ready to get found by the users of the next release.
>> Would be it possible to create a view that includes warnings? Maybe,
>> by
>> adding another colour for "succeeds, but with warnings"?
> It's definitely possible (and planned), the question is whether we
> consider it to be critical enough to implement for 1.33. Doug?

It's not critical for 1.33. If we're going to fix something for 1.33,
we should fix those regressions on the unresolved issues page :)


Boost-testing list run by mbergal at