Boost Testing :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-20 09:11:44

Next message: Toon Knapen: "Re: [Boost-testing] FFT-* engines not running since quite some time"
Previous message: Markus Schöpflin: "Re: [Boost-testing] TRU64 and serialization tests"
Next in thread: David Abrahams: "[Boost-testing] [PING] toolset name changing and regressions"
Reply: David Abrahams: "[Boost-testing] [PING] toolset name changing and regressions"

With all the updating of toolset names we've done recently, have we
got a system in place for ensuring that failures are detected properly
as regressions and not mistaken for failures on newly-added compilers?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

Next message: Toon Knapen: "Re: [Boost-testing] FFT-* engines not running since quite some time"
Previous message: Markus Schöpflin: "Re: [Boost-testing] TRU64 and serialization tests"
Next in thread: David Abrahams: "[Boost-testing] [PING] toolset name changing and regressions"
Reply: David Abrahams: "[Boost-testing] [PING] toolset name changing and regressions"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-testing list run by mbergal at meta-comm.com