Re: [Boost-testing] RudbekAssociates tests broken?

From: Douglas Gregor (doug.gregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-06 07:54:12

On Sep 6, 2005, at 7:40 AM, John Maddock wrote:
> It does indeed!
>
> boost/version.hpp and BOOST_LIB_VERSION had been incorrectly updated

That would be my fault :)

> - in
> point of fact the notes in the header were correct and mirror the  
> getting
> started guide - but as we haven't done a patch release like this  
> before the
> SNAFU isn't particularly surprising.  Thank heavens for regression  
> testing !
> :-)

Does that mean that 1.33.1 will produce compiled libraries with  
exactly the same name as 1.33.0?  That usually implies binary  
compatibility, which we have *never* attempted.

     Doug