Re: [Boost-testing] [QNX6] Status report - comments please

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-31 11:37:54

Jim Douglas <jim_at_[hidden]> writes:

> David Abrahams wrote:
>>>> I'm not 100% sure, but I have managed to run the tests using
>>>> Dinkum locally. I will check my patched version for compatability
>>>> with GNU on the next run and let you know the results.
>>>
>>>OK.
>> FWIW, I'm waiting to hear from you before I consider making any
>> changes.
>
> I have attached the patched type_id.cpp file used on the last sucessful 
> run. As you can see I took the coward's route and removed all the 
> existing conditional stuff :-) 

:(

The problem is that I can't tell exactly what I ought to be changing
for QNX support.  I need to see more "surgical" changes.

> This hack works for both the Dinkum and 
> GNU libraries. The QNX GNU library does have a cxxabi.h file but in this 
> context it proves to be redundant. (Do you need to include it at all?)

It depends on whether BOOST_PYTHON_HAVE_GCC_CP_DEMANGLE is getting set
in type_id.hpp.  Which version of GCC are you using?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com