Boost Testing :
From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-28 10:56:36
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Markus Sch?pflin wrote:
>> I just uploaded the first bbv2 regression run of HP-CXX 7.1-006 on Tru64,
>> the runner ID is Comsoft. It can be compared to the HP Testdrive runner,
>> which uses the same compiler.
> Unfortunately, the tests results still did not show in the test matrix. How
> often are reports regenerated?
They are there now, I just checked. Unfortunately some old result were
picked up as well, so only the column hp_cxx-71_006_tru64 is valid. I just
started another clean run, so this should clear up in a day or so.
>> Once the latest regression.py is in CVS and any V1-V2 differences are
>> sorted out, I will switch the HP Testdrive runner to V2 as well.
>> I will try to take care of the expected failure markup too, as the toolset
>> names have changed but this will probably takes some days.
I just checked in the first bunch of markups, so the results should look a
little better when the report is regenerated.