Re: [Boost-testing] Nuking old test results on HEAD

From: Victor A. Wagner Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-26 09:26:04

At 05:28 2006-05-25, you wrote:
>After the recent switch to V2 and the diversion of most testers to the
>branch, ~75% of HEAD test results are "somewhat" dated. Even with the
>gradual graying out of the headers of old results, I find it cumbersome
>to find the relevant ones. If there are no objections before May 28th
>12:00 UT, I will delete all HEAD results that are older than one month.

sounds good to me.
I'd be running tests on HEAD except the  bjam install puts files in 
the same place when doing the HEAD and the branch.  Further you end 
up with some library files with the same name which are NOT the 
same.  Recipe for disaster.

>--
>Andreas Huber
>
>When replying by private email, please remove the words spam and trap
>from the address shown in the header.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Boost-Testing mailing list
>Boost-Testing_at_[hidden]
>http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-testing

Victor A. Wagner Jr.      http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
               "There oughta be a law"