Re: [Boost-testing] What happened to "run" commands?

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-02 12:35:31

Rene Rivera <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]> writes:

> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Rene Rivera <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> 
>>> David Abrahams wrote:
>>>> Failed "run" tests don't seem to be showing the command used to run
>>>> them anymore (e.g. http://tinyurl.com/flf2q).  That is often crucial
>>>> information.  Can it be recovered?
>>> Seems to be there now.
>> 
>> I don't see it.  Where is Python invoked?
>
> Oh, never mind, I see what you mean now. The "python qqq.py ..." part is 
> missing from the run output. Looking... OK it's not in the XML result 
> files. So it's not an XSLT problem. Either proccess_jam_log is skipping 
> that part, or it's not being output by the Boost.Build py_run action.

It's surely the former.  Someone would have had to make some serious
mods to bjam to suppress the text of a failing command that was
expected to succeed.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com