Boost Testing :
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-02 12:35:31
Rene Rivera <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Rene Rivera <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>> David Abrahams wrote:
>>>> Failed "run" tests don't seem to be showing the command used to run
>>>> them anymore (e.g. http://tinyurl.com/flf2q). That is often crucial
>>>> information. Can it be recovered?
>>> Seems to be there now.
>> I don't see it. Where is Python invoked?
> Oh, never mind, I see what you mean now. The "python qqq.py ..." part is
> missing from the run output. Looking... OK it's not in the XML result
> files. So it's not an XSLT problem. Either proccess_jam_log is skipping
> that part, or it's not being output by the Boost.Build py_run action.
It's surely the former. Someone would have had to make some serious
mods to bjam to suppress the text of a failing command that was
expected to succeed.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com