Re: [Boost-testing] How to mark a test as passing unexpectedly?

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-21 07:30:40

Roland Schwarz wrote:
> John Maddock wrote:
>> I thought we had pulled the read_write_mutex out of the cvs tree
>> entirely because of the issues it has?  If it's known not to be
>> functional, should we be including it at all?
>
> It has been pulled out only from in 1.33 branch, but kept in HEAD.
> I could do the same for 1.34. Also deleting any references from the
> documentation.
>
> Since we are going to provide a rewrite for 1.35 this is possibly the
> best way to proceed. I just felt a little uncomfortable to do this
> now, while everyone is eagerly waiting for realease of 1.34. But then
> if you see this as kind of "bug fixing" I should remove it.
>
> Anthony also suggested to remove it. So I will remove it from 1.34
> branch.

If it's unchanged from pre-1.33 then yes, I suspect it should be removed, 
but maybe you should raise this on the main boost development list just to 
be sure :-)

John.