Re: [Boost-testing] Lots of spurious Borland failures?

From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-20 23:05:10

Rene Rivera wrote:
> Thomas Witt wrote:
>> AlisdairM wrote:
>>> John Maddock wrote:
>>>
>>> I am concerned that JustSoftwareSolutions are not so much reporting
>>> regressions, as running tests in new configurations - release builds.
>>>
>>> This is an incredibly valuable contribution, but nailing these problems
>>> is new work, not fixing regressions.  Given that we really want to ship
>>> 1.34 sooner rather than later, I would suggest this test runner focus
>>> back on the mainline, and we pay attention to release-configuration
>>> issues for 1.35.
>> FWIW I do agree with Alisdair.
> 
> What I was doing in the past was tagging the toolset with a clear marker 
>   that I was doing release builds. This prevented those runs from 
> getting considered as part of the release toolsets. Either adding 
> "~release" or "_release" to the toolset version works.

This sounds great to me. Anthony can you do that?

Thanks

Thomas

-- 
Thomas Witt
witt_at_[hidden]