|
Boost Testing : |
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-29 11:55:51
on Wed Mar 28 2007, Thomas Witt <witt-AT-acm.org> wrote:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> on Wed Mar 28 2007, Thomas Witt <witt-AT-acm.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>
>> IMO that would be bad,
>
> Why?
Because we'll have fewer testers (some people will just stop) and it
will take too long to see the results.
>> and I don't think this has anything to do with incremental
>> testing. Old results will hang around unless updated or removed
>> whether or not incremental testing is enabled.
>
> To clarify I am talking about results for tests that no longer
> exist.
Do you think they're still in the table because of incremental
testing? Martin tests incrementally but he doesn't have them AFAIK.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com Don't Miss BoostCon 2007! ==> http://www.boostcon.com