Boost Testing :
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-07-03 11:32:28
on Tue Jul 03 2007, Joaquin M Lopez Munoz <joaquin-AT-tid.es> wrote:
>> I'm not convinced it is a good idea to rerun the tests until the results
>> look good, if the testing site is known to work reliably (as it is the
>> case for Victor's). Doing so simply hides a known issue. One could call
>> that lying about the quality of the software tested.
> What can we do then? It's not possible to mark the thing as
> expected failure unless we mark every possible test in that way,
> since the problem pops up anywhere --I've seen it at no less
> than ten different spots one time or another.
Hmm, that definitely changes things. Can you offer more detail?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com The Astoria Seminar ==> http://www.astoriaseminar.com