Boost Testing :
From: Sebastian Redl (sebastian.redl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-09-25 10:31:24
Phil Endecott wrote:
> Suggestion: abandon this stuff, and write it again in Python or C++.
> I speak from my own previous bad experience of this language, which I
> will not use again.
Aside from being complex, it's also rather big. And an imperative
version would be even bigger. So I'm not sure if that's such a good idea.
On the other hand, it might reduce the ridiculous run time of the
summary generation sheet (accounts for about 95% of the generation time
on my setup, and the tendency is to rise as more results are added). So
it's a worthy long-time goal.