Boost Testing :
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-09-25 10:57:47
Sebastian Redl wrote:
> Phil Endecott wrote:
>> Suggestion: abandon this stuff, and write it again in Python or C++.
>> I speak from my own previous bad experience of this language, which I
>> will not use again.
> Aside from being complex, it's also rather big. And an imperative
> version would be even bigger. So I'm not sure if that's such a good idea.
From personal experience I can say that's likely not true :-) ... I did
such a port for the doxygen2boostbook.xsl (49.7K)
to Python (35.7K)
A 14K difference (~30%), and that includes a larger comment/code ratio
on the Python code.
Regardless the ideal, which has been mentioned before, is to go directly
to a database and generate the pages dynamically.
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo