Re: [Boost-testing] HP-UX_pa_risc_gcc, Sandia-pathscale, Sandia-intel, Sandia-gcc Python failures

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-09 17:20:00

Boris Gubenko wrote:
> For HP-UX_pa_risc_gcc, the problem is not that the system does not have the
> Python development system installed. The problem is that Python headers are
> installed in /usr/local/include/python/ while Boost.Python expects them in
> /usr/local/include/python2.3 (this is Python 2.3.3, I don't know how it was
> built).
> 
> There may be a way in BBv2 to specify location of Python headers, (short
> of adding <compileflags>"-I/usr/local/include/python/" to user-config.jam),
> but, instead, I built private Python 2.5 and will use it instead of the
> system Python.
> 
> I just started the tests and expect the results dated Friday, Nov. 9 to
> not show problem with Python headers.

Thanks, Boris.

--Beman