Boost logo

Boost Testing :

From: Jonathan Turkanis (turkanis_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-21 13:37:49

Christopher Cambly wrote:

> I had the same thought at one point. Though not "unconditionally", I
> suspect that if _LONG_LONG is defined you can assume that the 64 bit
> variants are always available. I did some trivial tests and that appears
> to be true.
>> I think I may add a couple of tests to verify which functions are
>> available with which options.
> If you would like me to test something for you let me know.

Yes, please. I'd like to know whether the foo64 functions are available,
and the size of off_t, under the various combinations of -qlonglong,
_LARGE_FILES, and address-model.

> Chris Cambly
> XL C/C++ Compiler Development


Jonathan Turkanis

Boost-testing list run by mbergal at