|
Boost Testing : |
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-06 06:22:01
Richard Webb wrote:
>> * BOOST_IS_ABSTRACT is now an intrinsic for some Visual C++
>> compilers
>> * Some other boost header defines BOOST_IS_ABSTRACT
>> * That interferes with your BOOST_IS_ABSTRACT
>>
>
> I posted about this yesterday. See
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/173362
>
> The sandia gcc 4.3.0 tests seem to be failing in the same place as
> well.
Ah, this may be my fault: several compilers support the __is_abstract
intrinsic which I hooked up in type_traits with the BOOST_IS_ABSTRACT macro.
I hadn't realised the macro was in use somewhere else - what's your use case
for this?
John.