Boost logo

Boost Testing :

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-06 06:22:01

Richard Webb wrote:
>> * BOOST_IS_ABSTRACT is now an intrinsic for some Visual C++
>> compilers
>> * Some other boost header defines BOOST_IS_ABSTRACT
>> * That interferes with your BOOST_IS_ABSTRACT
> I posted about this yesterday. See
> The sandia gcc 4.3.0 tests seem to be failing in the same place as
> well.

Ah, this may be my fault: several compilers support the __is_abstract
intrinsic which I hooked up in type_traits with the BOOST_IS_ABSTRACT macro.
I hadn't realised the macro was in use somewhere else - what's your use case
for this?


Boost-testing list run by mbergal at