Boost logo

Boost Testing :

From: Richard Webb (richard.webb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-06 05:43:49


Sohail Somani <sohail <at> taggedtype.net> writes:

>
>
> I think I saw this the other day. Is this the problem where it is trying
> to instantiate an abstract class? If so, my guess is:
>
> * BOOST_IS_ABSTRACT is now an intrinsic for some Visual C++ compilers
> * Some other boost header defines BOOST_IS_ABSTRACT
> * That interferes with your BOOST_IS_ABSTRACT
>

I posted about this yesterday. See
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/173362

The sandia gcc 4.3.0 tests seem to be failing in the same place as well.


Boost-testing list run by mbergal at meta-comm.com