Boost Testing :
Subject: Re: [Boost-testing] process_jam_log and compiler_status producing invalid report
From: Steven Solie (ssolie_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-03-03 13:48:04
On 02/03/2009, Christopher Cambly wrote:
> We have had some modest success with this approach. Although, a few of
> the nightly regression test processing scripts had to be "modified" in
> order to achieve the results generation. I'm not sure if anyone else
> interested in this as an alternative to compiler_status.
I wouldn't mind taking a look at it myself. I'm not having any luck
with the python scripts and compiler_status is currently broken so
maybe this will work.