Re: [Boost-testing] pathscale 3.1 reporting problems?

Subject: Re: [Boost-testing] pathscale 3.1 reporting problems?
From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-24 08:21:10

K. Noel Belcourt wrote:
> So this seems to fix the problem (and the same patch is needed for the 
> operator[] (keyword<unique_id,false>) const overload right below this.
> 
>     ref_type        operator[]( keyword<unique_id,true> ) {
>       if(m_erased) {
>         return nil_t::inst().template any_cast<ref_type>();
>       } else {
>         return m_value;
>       }
>     }
> 
> Is this enough information for someone to code up and submit a patch for 
> trunk?

Why does the template is required here? nil is non-template structure. 
Many other compilers do not have a problems with this.

How can I test with this compiler?

Gennadiy