Boost logo

Boost Testing :

Subject: Re: [Boost-testing] pathscale 3.1 reporting problems?
From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-24 08:21:10

K. Noel Belcourt wrote:
> So this seems to fix the problem (and the same patch is needed for the
> operator[] (keyword<unique_id,false>) const overload right below this.
> ref_type operator[]( keyword<unique_id,true> ) {
> if(m_erased) {
> return nil_t::inst().template any_cast<ref_type>();
> } else {
> return m_value;
> }
> }
> Is this enough information for someone to code up and submit a patch for
> trunk?

Why does the template is required here? nil is non-template structure.
Many other compilers do not have a problems with this.

How can I test with this compiler?


Boost-testing list run by mbergal at