Re: [Boost-testing] pathscale 3.1 reporting problems?

Subject: Re: [Boost-testing] pathscale 3.1 reporting problems?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-24 10:33:28

AMDG

Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> K. Noel Belcourt wrote:
>> So this seems to fix the problem (and the same patch is needed for 
>> the operator[] (keyword<unique_id,false>) const overload right below 
>> this.
>>
>>     ref_type        operator[]( keyword<unique_id,true> ) {
>>       if(m_erased) {
>>         return nil_t::inst().template any_cast<ref_type>();
>>       } else {
>>         return m_value;
>>       }
>>     }
>>
>> Is this enough information for someone to code up and submit a patch 
>> for trunk?
>
> Why does the template is required here? nil is non-template structure. 
> Many other compilers do not have a problems with this.
>
> How can I test with this compiler?

It appears to be a gcc 3.3 specific problem.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe