Re: [Boost-testing] Labeling C++0x enabled tests

Subject: Re: [Boost-testing] Labeling C++0x enabled tests
From: K. Noel Belcourt (kbelco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-03 11:45:38

On Sep 3, 2009, at 8:51 AM, Beman Dawes wrote:

> Thanks to Noel for appending "_gnu++0x" to the Sandia-gcc test  
> names to indicate that the compiler is running with the option that  
> enables C++0x features. For example, "gcc- 4.4.1_gnu++0x".
>
> I find this really helpful, and hope that other testers will also  
> indicate C++0x features are enabled if the compiler requires a  
> specific option to enable them.
>
> However, could we agree on a shorter naming convention? Screen  
> width is scarce on the regression reporting pages. See http:// 
> beta.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/summary.html
>
> Perhaps just "-0x" as in "gcc- 4.4.1-0x"?

Sure, I'll make the changes.

By the way, I'll begin running the MPI tests for both trunk and  
release now that the reporting is working.  But I'll have to create a  
separate tester for each toolset since the MPI installation is  
toolset specific.

-- Noel