Re: [Boost-testing] [Important!] Testers.. New version of bjam, action likely required..

Subject: Re: [Boost-testing] [Important!] Testers.. New version of bjam, action likely required..
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-04-06 00:38:29

On 4/5/2010 5:01 PM, Rene Rivera wrote:
> On 4/5/2010 4:49 PM, Belcourt, Kenneth wrote:
>> Is that enough information to get a patch in place?
>
> I think so. But how to actually change it is another story. This is a
> result of a change Volodya did for supporting BB configuration. So we'll
> have to see how he wants to handle it. Which mainly boils down to if we
> should include those configuration results in the test results, or not.
> He should be sleeping at the moment :-) So we'll see in 7 or so hours.
>
> I know it's going to be painful for people.. But I guess I have to
> change bjam back to the old version until we resolve this.

OK, I think I fixed it.. The rather blunt way of just commenting out the 
check. Seems to work the way I tested things at least. I've now put back 
the testing to use 3.1.18.

-- 
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafik/redshift-software.com
-- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail