Boost Testing :
Subject: Re: [Boost-testing] [Important!] Testers.. New version of bjam, action likely required..
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-04-06 09:31:28
On 4/5/2010 11:38 PM, Rene Rivera wrote:
> On 4/5/2010 5:01 PM, Rene Rivera wrote:
>> On 4/5/2010 4:49 PM, Belcourt, Kenneth wrote:
>>> Is that enough information to get a patch in place?
>> I think so. But how to actually change it is another story. This is a
>> result of a change Volodya did for supporting BB configuration. So we'll
>> have to see how he wants to handle it. Which mainly boils down to if we
>> should include those configuration results in the test results, or not.
>> He should be sleeping at the moment :-) So we'll see in 7 or so hours.
>> I know it's going to be painful for people.. But I guess I have to
>> change bjam back to the old version until we resolve this.
> OK, I think I fixed it.. The rather blunt way of just commenting out the
> check. Seems to work the way I tested things at least. I've now put back
> the testing to use 3.1.18.
Oops. What I get for working late.. Is that I end up doing the "svn ci"
in the wrong dir and not noticing. So it's really checked in now. And
thanks to Volodya for noticing :-)
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail