Re: [Boost-testing] [boost]filesystem/v2 failure breaking Darwintesting

Subject: Re: [Boost-testing] [boost]filesystem/v2 failure breaking Darwintesting
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-06-17 16:57:57

On 6/17/2010 3:51 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:
> On 6/17/2010 1:22 PM, Robert Ramey wrote:
>> Christopher Cambly wrote:
>>>
>>> Does the tooling (process jam log) need to use Boost.Filesystem V3 or
>>> can it continue to use the Boost.Filesystem V2?  I'm ok with running
>>> the regression tests on Boost.Filesystem V3, but right now we cannot
>>> build the tools so testing stops.
>>
>> Yet another demonstration why we should testing each library (trunk version) against
>> the last release version of other librarys an tools.
>
> Yes.

Yes.

> _Or_, yet another reason why our build, test and reporting tools
> should be provided by a third party.

But it has nothing to do with third party or not. It has everything to 
do with the organizational structure of Boost itself.

-- 
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafik/redshift-software.com
-- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail