Re: [Boost-testing] clang-darwin-tot11 tester with errors in a lot of libraries

Subject: Re: [Boost-testing] clang-darwin-tot11 tester with errors in a lot of libraries
From: Marshall Clow (mclow.lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-07 16:17:52

On Jun 5, 2013, at 11:09 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Le 05/06/13 23:53, Marshall Clow a écrit :
>> On Jun 5, 2013, at 10:23 AM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Marshall,
>>> 
>>> please could you tell us the configuration you are using in this tester clang-darwin-tot11?
>> Sure.
>> 
>> using clang : tot-11
>> 	: "/Sources/LLVM/build/llvm-cmake-nodebug/bin/clang++"
>> 	: <cxxflags>"-std=c++11 -stdlib=libc++ -I /Sources/LLVM/libcxx/include" <linkflags>"-stdlib=libc++"
>> 	;
>> 
>> The actual clang++ executable is built from the LLVM sources about an hour before the test runs start.
>> 
> I was expecting a specific compiler version.

Sorry; "tot" stands for "tip of tree". It's "that day's" clang.

> Do you have an idea why there are so many failing tests?

No, but I'll look into it this weekend.

> BTW, the target clang-darwin-tot has also a lot of failing test.

Same compiler, just w/o C++11 turned on.

-- Marshall

Marshall Clow     Idio Software   <mailto:mclow.lists_at_[hidden]>

A.D. 1517: Martin Luther nails his 95 Theses to the church door and is promptly moderated down to (-1, Flamebait).
        -- Yu Suzuki