Re: [Boost-testing] clang-darwin-tot11 tester with errors in a lot of libraries

Subject: Re: [Boost-testing] clang-darwin-tot11 tester with errors in a lot of libraries
From: Ben Pope (benpope81_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-07 17:35:37

It's looking good now from what I saw.
On 8 Jun, 2013 4:18 AM, "Marshall Clow" <mclow.lists_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On Jun 5, 2013, at 11:09 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba <
> vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> > Le 05/06/13 23:53, Marshall Clow a écrit :
> >> On Jun 5, 2013, at 10:23 AM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba <
> vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Marshall,
> >>>
> >>> please could you tell us the configuration you are using in this
> tester clang-darwin-tot11?
> >> Sure.
> >>
> >> using clang : tot-11
> >>      : "/Sources/LLVM/build/llvm-cmake-nodebug/bin/clang++"
> >>      : <cxxflags>"-std=c++11 -stdlib=libc++ -I
> /Sources/LLVM/libcxx/include" <linkflags>"-stdlib=libc++"
> >>      ;
> >>
> >> The actual clang++ executable is built from the LLVM sources about an
> hour before the test runs start.
> >>
> > I was expecting a specific compiler version.
>
> Sorry; "tot" stands for "tip of tree". It's "that day's" clang.
>
> > Do you have an idea why there are so many failing tests?
>
> No, but I'll look into it this weekend.
>
> > BTW, the target clang-darwin-tot has also a lot of failing test.
>
> Same compiler, just w/o C++11 turned on.
>
> -- Marshall
>
> Marshall Clow     Idio Software   <mailto:mclow.lists_at_[hidden]>
>
> A.D. 1517: Martin Luther nails his 95 Theses to the church door and is
> promptly moderated down to (-1, Flamebait).
>         -- Yu Suzuki
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-Testing mailing list
> Boost-Testing_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-testing
>