Re: [Boost-testing] Smaller Windows Builds

Subject: Re: [Boost-testing] Smaller Windows Builds
From: Tom Kent (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-14 23:21:08

I'm not sure what the problem was, but things are running fine now.

On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Rene Rivera <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Tom Kent <lists_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Rene Rivera <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> OK, I've implemented some additional test targets removal code. Because
>>> I did not want to impact current testing the additional removal is not
>>> enabled. To use add a "--remove-test-targets" option to the b2 invocation.
>>> This will remove all executable and objects for all test targets (it
>>> doesn't remove them for dependent library targets though). I'd appreciate
>>> some feedback as to how it works and if there are any problems since it's
>>> not obvious code.
>>>
>>> I haven't been able to get this to run, I *think* it is deleting
>> process_jam_log.exe before it is finished with it, because I am getting an
>> error:
>>
>
> Could you find, and post, the b2 command that runs to build
> process_jam_log? Note, I don't see how this could be the problem since PJL
> is not a test target. And my changes only impact test targets (and
> derivatives).
>
>
> --
> -- Rene Rivera
> -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
> -- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net
> -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-Testing mailing list
> Boost-Testing_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-testing
>