Boost Testing :
Subject: Re: [Boost-testing] Smaller Windows Builds
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-15 11:22:20
Which testers are you using the option on? I need to watch the results to
see if there are problems.
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Tom Kent <lists_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I'm not sure what the problem was, but things are running fine now.
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Rene Rivera <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]>
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Tom Kent <lists_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Rene Rivera <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]>
>>>> OK, I've implemented some additional test targets removal code. Because
>>>> I did not want to impact current testing the additional removal is not
>>>> enabled. To use add a "--remove-test-targets" option to the b2 invocation.
>>>> This will remove all executable and objects for all test targets (it
>>>> doesn't remove them for dependent library targets though). I'd appreciate
>>>> some feedback as to how it works and if there are any problems since it's
>>>> not obvious code.
>>>> I haven't been able to get this to run, I *think* it is deleting
>>> process_jam_log.exe before it is finished with it, because I am getting an
>> Could you find, and post, the b2 command that runs to build
>> process_jam_log? Note, I don't see how this could be the problem since PJL
>> is not a test target. And my changes only impact test targets (and
>> -- Rene Rivera
>> -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
>> -- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net
>> -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail
>> Boost-Testing mailing list
> Boost-Testing mailing list
-- -- Rene Rivera -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail