Re: [Boost-testing] Adding regression tests for mingw(-64)/gcc and clang on Windows

Subject: Re: [Boost-testing] Adding regression tests for mingw(-64)/gcc and clang on Windows
From: Jim Bell (Jim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-10-19 22:02:17

On 2015-10-18 9:56 PM, Rene Rivera wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Jim Bell <Jim_at_[hidden] 
> <mailto:Jim_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>
>
>     On 2015-10-10 12:25 AM, Edward Diener wrote:
>
>         On 8/12/2015 11:25 PM, Jim Bell wrote:
>
>
>
>             On 2015-08-11 11:47 PM, Edward Diener wrote:
>
>                 ...
>
>
>             I have mingw tests for mingw-32, mingw-w64 gcc 4.9, 4.8,
>             4.7, 4.6, 4.5,
>             and 4.4.  Also the mingw-gcc that ships with Qt 5.4, Qt
>             5.2 and Qt 4.
>
>             I don't recall everything I did to get it working, but
>             I'll fire one
>             back up tomorrow.
>
>
>         I noticed that you were contibuting mingw/gcc tests for
>         Windows and then you stopped doing so. Is it possible to
>         peridically run those tests again, or is is taking up too much
>         of your time and resources ?
>
>         I am going to attempt again to contribute my own gcc, and
>         perhaps even clang, tests for Windows, although clang is much
>         more error-prone when dealing with non-header only libraries.
>
>
>     I'm glad to periodically run my battery of tests, but would
>     request that at least the master test results stay in the
>     regression results matrix for a longer period of time.
>
>
> How long?

How about 90 days? The audience for master is very different than for 
develop.