Boost Testing :
Subject: Re: [Boost-testing] Adding regression tests for mingw(-64)/gcc and clang on Windows
From: Jim Bell (Jim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-10-19 22:05:55
On 2015-10-18 10:22 PM, Edward Diener wrote:
> On 10/18/2015 10:14 PM, Jim Bell wrote:
>> On 2015-10-10 12:25 AM, Edward Diener wrote:
>>> On 8/12/2015 11:25 PM, Jim Bell wrote:
>>>> On 2015-08-11 11:47 PM, Edward Diener wrote:
>>>> I have mingw tests for mingw-32, mingw-w64 gcc 4.9, 4.8, 4.7, 4.6,
>>>> and 4.4. Also the mingw-gcc that ships with Qt 5.4, Qt 5.2 and Qt 4.
>>>> I don't recall everything I did to get it working, but I'll fire one
>>>> back up tomorrow.
>>> I noticed that you were contibuting mingw/gcc tests for Windows and
>>> then you stopped doing so. Is it possible to peridically run those
>>> tests again, or is is taking up too much of your time and resources ?
>>> I am going to attempt again to contribute my own gcc, and perhaps even
>>> clang, tests for Windows, although clang is much more error-prone when
>>> dealing with non-header only libraries.
>> I'm glad to periodically run my battery of tests, but would request that
>> at least the master test results stay in the regression results matrix
>> for a longer period of time.
> I don't know how it is determined how long test results stay in the
> regression tests result matrix for either 'develop' or 'master'. But
> even if you could run your gcc on Windows test once a week I would
> view this as a big plus for the regression test results on Windows.
I can only run one set per day, so cycling through them all takes a full