RE: [Boost-Users] RE: object_pool, O(N) destroy?

From: kevin_godden_at_[hidden]
Date: 2002-01-29 05:27:36

I agree, it does sound like a job for a Policy whatsit.  If I get a chance I
could try a few things and see if anything works out and let you know.
Although, if time constraints work out the way I think they will, I might
have to stick with a cut&paste solution!

Kevin\

-----Original Message-----
From: scleary_at_[hidden] [mailto:scleary_at_[hidden]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 5:13 AM
To: Boost-Users_at_[hidden]
Cc: shammah_at_[hidden]
Subject: [Boost-Users] RE: object_pool, O(N) destroy?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: hicks [mailto:hicks_at_[hidden]]
> 
> It sounds like a case where a type trait, identifying the need for the 
> pool to responsible for deletion,
> would be appropriate.  Then objects which did not need to be destroyed 
> (e.g. ptrs, "plain" structs)
> could be handled by optimized code.  But that's more work than cut and 
> paste.

Actually, the difference is in how the pool is used, not on the type of
object being allocated.  So it sounds more like a case for a policy-based
design.  Too bad, I just don't have time to do that right now... :(

        -Steve

Info: <http://www.boost.org>
Wiki: <http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/