RE: [Boost-Users] Re: most recent thread_pool implementation?

From: Tom Matelich (tmatelich_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-11 14:39:22

Also, files that are created in a branch and do not exist on the mainline
yet live in the Attic.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: bill_kempf [mailto:williamkempf_at_[hidden]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 11:02 AM
> To: Boost-Users_at_[hidden]
> Subject: [Boost-Users] Re: most recent thread_pool implementation?
> 
> 
> --- In Boost-Users_at_y..., Niall Kelly <ngktab_at_y...> wrote:
> > 
> > I've recently started using Boost and am working with 1.28.0 
> (modified to include the latest Boost.Signals from the CVS 
> repository).
> > 
> > I just obtained David Moore's thread_pool implementation from 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/thread_pool.zip and tweaked 
> it slightly in order to build it with gcc 2.95.3 (no <limits>). I 
> since noticed some more recent thread_pool source on CVS under 
> boost/boost/libs/thread/src/Attic (bill_kempf).
> 
> The attic is used to store files that have been removed (cvs 
> remove).  Not sure exactly what you're seeing in the attic, but it's 
> not really important.  You shouldn't ever have to deal directly with 
> the attic.
> 
> > What is the purpose of the Attic subdirs? - unofficial work-in-
> progress type stuff or would I be better off using these versions of 
> thread_pool?
> 
> The latest thread_pool stuff can be found in CVS under a branch named 
> thread_development.  This is stuff that's under development, however, 
> so use at your own risk.
> 
> > Also, is thread_pool likely to be included in the next official 
> Boost release? Any idea when this might be? Finally, is a 
> boost::xtime replacement likely to appear in the next release?
> 
> Yes, thread_pool is slated for the next major version of 
> Boost.Threads.  There's no release date yet... the next version is a 
> significant change being worked on by myself and a few others, and 
> may need a review process before releasing.  I expect development to 
> last another few months at least.  There are no current plans to 
> replace xtime... that's really something that needs to be outside of 
> the Boost.Threads library and I don't have the expertise or the time 
> to dedicate to it.
>  
> Bill Kempf
> 
> 
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
> ---------------------~-->
> Free $5 Love Reading
> Risk Free!
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/TPvn8A/PfREAA/Ey.GAA/EbFolB/TM
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------~->
> 
> Info: <http://www.boost.org>
> Wiki: <http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl>
> Unsubscribe: <mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
>  
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER:  The information contained in this transmission, including 
any attachments, may contain confidential information of Zetec, Inc. 
and is intended only for the use of the addressee(s) listed above.
Unauthorized review, dissemination, reproduction, or other use of the 
information contained in this transmission is strictly prohibited. If 
you have received this transmission in error or have reason to believe
you are not authorized to receive it, please notify the sender by 
return email and promptly delete the transmission.

Zetec, Inc. reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all 
messages sent to or received from this email address.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------