Boost Users :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Mark Storer (mstorer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-11 13:12:01

Next message: Tom Matelich: "RE: [Boost-Users] Re: most recent thread_pool implementation?"
Previous message: bill_kempf: "Re: most recent thread_pool implementation?"
Next in thread: Peter Dimov: "Re: [Boost-Users] weak_ptr... no * or ->?"
Reply: Peter Dimov: "Re: [Boost-Users] weak_ptr... no * or ->?"

Is there a reason weak_ptr doesn't have overloaded * and -> operators?

--Mark Storer
Software Engineer
Cardiff Software

#include <disclaimer>
typedef std::disclaimer<Cardiff> Discard;

Next message: Tom Matelich: "RE: [Boost-Users] Re: most recent thread_pool implementation?"
Previous message: bill_kempf: "Re: most recent thread_pool implementation?"
Next in thread: Peter Dimov: "Re: [Boost-Users] weak_ptr... no * or ->?"
Reply: Peter Dimov: "Re: [Boost-Users] weak_ptr... no * or ->?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net