|
Boost Users : |
From: jhr.walter_at_[hidden]
Date: 2003-03-06 03:34:05
Hi,
[snip]
> > > If the constructor also would accept a row I could use it as a
> > > parameter type for function calls when I want to express, that
> > > only 'data' types are expected and 'expressions' are not wanted.
> > > (Sorry for the sloppy formulation, I am not sure how to express this
> > > more concise.)
> >
> > I hope, we'll be able to solve this, too.
>
> I am not sure about your last statement. Do you mean a kind
> of 'vector_proxy' that can act as a placeholder to a row/column or
> another vector?
No, I basically meant, I hope that you'll find appropriate signatures for
your functions. I still believe you'll either have to use 'expressions' or
have to enumerate all overloads for your 'data' types (and that could be
many ;-).
Sorry for the confusion,
Joerg
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net