RE: [Boost-users] Re: boost::shared_ptr performance

From: Tom Matelich (tmatelich_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-20 12:28:04

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew Wilson [mailto:stlsoft_at_[hidden]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 11:27 AM
> To: boost-users_at_[hidden]
> Subject: [Boost-users] Re: boost::shared_ptr performance
> 
> 
> > >
> > > [I posted this in boost.devel, but got no response.
> > > Presumably that was the
> > > wrong group. :)]
> > >
> >
> > I'm going to respond, but I don't have much to say.  I 
> would think that
> with all the work you put into making this comparison that you could
> probably determine why smart_ptr is slower than yours.  To me this
> comparison is interesting but not without comparing your code with
> smart_ptr.  Given the lack of code, I have to assume you're 
> waiting for
> someone to say something like, "WOW!!! I gotta get me some of that!"
> 
> No, I was seeking information, as I said.
> 
> "There are environment settings for which boost::shared_ptr will
> perform much better. If that's so, can someone help me out 
> with suggestions
> of what defines to make?"
> 
> It turns out that there are.
> 
> If I was wanting to make a splash, I'd got for a dip down at 
> the beach.

:)  

Sorry for any appearance of hostility.  I'll check out the devel thread.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER:  Information contained in this message and/or
attachment(s) may contain confidential information of Zetec, Inc.
If you have received this transmission in error, please notify
the sender by return email.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------