RE: [Boost-users] Compiler Generator Tools

From: Victor A. Wagner Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-11 09:27:24

What advantage, if any, do you see over Spirit?

At Tuesday 2004-03-09 04:59, you wrote:
>In fact, there is an open source C++ parser. It is OpenC++. It has a project
>on sourceforge and a mail list. It is quite cool, and have a LOT of
>additional features. One of its uses can however be a parser of C++ code. It
>works on Unix, Windows + cygwin.
>
>http://sourceforge.net/projects/opencxx/
>
>Nick
>
>P.S. It would be nice if it was part of boost. It could get a little help
>from the community, since it is a great project and could lead to many tool
>build on top of it, like code scanners and checkers, debugging aids and so
>on. The similar closed source product cost a LOT and not many programmers
>can afford them.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden]
>[mailto:boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Douglas Gregor
>Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 2:37 PM
>To: boost-users_at_[hidden]
>Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Compiler Generator Tools
>
>
>On Monday 08 March 2004 08:56 am, Roel.Sergeant_at_[hidden] wrote:
> > If you need a C/C++ parser, you might consider Wave, which uses
> > Spirit, and is highly standard compliant.
>
>Wave's a preprocessor, not a parser. I expect it will be quite a while
>before
>we get a C++ parser ("Tsunami?").
>
>         Doug
>_______________________________________________
>Boost-users mailing list
>Boost-users_at_[hidden]
>http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Boost-users mailing list
>Boost-users_at_[hidden]
>http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

Victor A. Wagner Jr.      http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
               "There oughta be a law"