[Boost-users] Re: array_traits?

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-18 09:49:33

"Jonathan Turkanis" <technews_at_[hidden]> writes:

> "Duane Murphy" <duanemurphy_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> news:20040718042011.21634_at_linux.murphyslogic.com...
>> Howdy fellow boosters,
>> Several years ago I started using array_traits. I gathered from some
>> later discussion that this library was never meant to be part of
> boost.
>> However, I really like the library and find it more useful than the
>> array<> implementation. Point in fact, array_traits and array<>
> overlap
>> but probably weren't meant to solve the same problems [1].
>>
>> Is array_traits around any more? I seem to recall something more
> general
>> purpose. Maybe container_traits?
>
> Thorsten Ottosen's Collection Traits library is the successor to
> array_traits. It was recently approved for inclusion in Boost and has
> been renamed Boost.Range.
>
> There was a note several days ago on the developers list that
> Boost.Range would be included in the next release but only
> 'unofficially', with no link to it on the libraries page.
>
> A version of the library is in the current CVS. See docs at
> http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/boost/boost/libs/range/doc/.

Which of those .htm[l] files is up-to-date?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com