Boost logo

Boost Users :

From: Caleb Epstein (caleb.epstein_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-20 20:45:19

On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 17:20:45 -0400, David Abrahams
<dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> "Jeff Garland" <jeff_at_[hidden]> writes:
> > I've given in to user demand -- the default constructor to
> > not_a_date_time will be in the 1.32 -- gregorian::date same story.
> Why was that the right choice? It seems like an opportunity for bugs.

    What would you propose as an alternative? I hope not the current
system time, the acquisition of which can be a relatively expensive
operation. I for one prefer the not_a_date_time option.

Caleb Epstein

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at, kalb at, bjorn.karlsson at, gregod at, wekempf at