[Boost-users] Re: date-time

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-21 06:47:51

Caleb Epstein <caleb.epstein_at_[hidden]> writes:

> On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 17:20:45 -0400, David Abrahams
> <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> "Jeff Garland" <jeff_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> 
>> > I've given in to user demand -- the default constructor to
>> > not_a_date_time will be in the 1.32 -- gregorian::date same story.
>> 
>> Why was that the right choice?  It seems like an opportunity for bugs.
>
>     What would you propose as an alternative?  

Not having a default constructor for for dates at all.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com