Re: [Boost-users] uBlas bindings in boost 1.34

From: Thomas Lemaire (thomas.lemaire_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-18 02:56:35

yes this is a typo (1.32)... I agree with you that it has not been 
"annouced that..." But a previous mail was confident about this point ;-)

cheers
thomas

Kresimir Fresl wrote:
> 
> Thomas Lemaire wrote:
> 
>> looking at http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/boost/1_32_0_draft/ it 
>> seems that uBlas bindings to LAPACK, ATLAS,... are not included in the 
>> 1.32 release, but it has been annouced on this list that they would 
>> be... Am I wrong ? What happened ?
> 
> 
> I am afraid that you are wrong. As far as can remember, it has never
> ``been annouced on this list that they would be'' ``included in the
> 1.32 release''. Bindings are a separate library from uBLAS. They are
> not complete (although they can be used) and therefore they were never
> proposed for the Boost formal review.
> 
> And, as Paul Baxter said is his reply, ``bindings haven't changed for
> a while'' (except for a few bug fixes) and they probably are not ``in
> sync with the latest ublas''. Karl and Toon are involved in ublas,
> and I don't have much time (even to check whether some ublas interface
> changes affected bindings).
> 
> Regards,
> 
> fres
> 
> PS. `1.34' in subject line is probably a typo, but maybe in
> version 1.34 ...  ;o)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

-- 
thomas